Instant, atomic, on-chain by default.
Send one instruction. TetraFi prices it by competition, nets the obligations, and settles atomically across chains, with compliance and a full audit trail built in.
Institutional flow is still built around bilateral relationships rather than competitive pricing and reliable on-chain infrastructure - and pays for it five ways.
Opposing flows cancel on paper, but each still pays the full toll: the bridge, the rebalance, the conversion. That toll is the floor under every spread you are quoted.
Multilateral netting.
Obligations offset across the network, so only the residual moves - and it settles atomically, with no counterparty risk. In design.
You prefund to participate, then fund the gap a second time when settlement runs on T+1 cycles, redemption queues and out-of-hours cutoffs against T+0 expectations.
No prefunding.
Capital stays yours until the trade settles, and T+0 Vaults front the wait. In design.
Pricing arrives one relationship at a time, with nothing to benchmark it against. And pool depth prices against you precisely as the ticket grows.
Open and global by construction.
Every eligible venue, desk and LP bids on the same request, so the spread compresses.
Compliance is reconstructed once settlement has already happened, every counterparty repeats the same review, and the audit trail is stitched together afterwards from partial records.
Gated before fan-out.
KYB, sanctions and jurisdiction policy clear a request before it reaches a desk, with one hash-chained evidence trail behind every fill.
One side always moves first. Until the other follows, the trade is a promise - and you are paying someone to guarantee it, posting capital against it, or wearing the risk.
Delivery-versus-payment, in its true form.
All legs settle together, or none do. No intermediary, no counterparty risk, and nothing ever leaves your control.
Traditional OTC vs TetraFi
One integration you own and govern, connected to a global liquidity and settlement network that gets deeper, safer and more efficient as it grows.
Message every desk and wait. A contract per desk, every time.
Onboard once. One policy, every counterparty. Submit one intent, liquidity comes to you.
One quote, one relationship. Compared manually, spread opaque and embedded.
Open by construction. Every desk bids on the same request. Aggregated liquidity, solver auction per trade.
KYB repeated desk by desk. Trust, not proof.
Decentralised. Cryptographically sound. Composable checks, oracle consensus, enforced on-chain against credentials - before a desk sees it.
Every trade settles gross. Principal exposed.
Both legs, or neither. Escrowed DvP. Settle instantly, or net in cycles.
Bridge menus and asset hops.
One signature. Routing and bridging, handled.
Pre-fund every venue.
No prefunding. Capital stays yours until it settles.
Stitched together afterwards.
Evidence by construction. Hash-chained, every order.
The problem, in numbers
vs TetraFi: one deployment and contracts you own, on top of a shared liquidity layer open to any eligible LP and venue, globally. Openness is what compresses the spread.
Any eligible LP, anywhere, competes for the same flow. More competition, tighter pricing.
Atomic settlement. Both legs, or neither.
Nothing embedded. Competing desks price it in the open.
One hash-chained trail, cryptographically verifiable.
Institutions adopt the pieces their flows need - compliance, netting, T+0 vaults, liquidity aggregation - through one integration. Hover to explore.
Trades create a web of bilateral obligations. TetraFi nets the whole set down to each party's single net residual, then settles only those, atomically, across chains.
Everyone pays everyone
15 bilateral obligations · $45M gross exposure
Net positions sum to zero: value is conserved, and only the residual moves.
Instant settlement / redemptions
A holder exits now, paid on a NAV-priced quote. TetraFi's T+0 Vaults front the payout with committed capital, and native redemption completes behind it on the issuer's own timeline - entirely onchain.
Exits - and multichain entries - clear at T+0, through NAV cycles, queues, weekends and cutoffs.
Quote-driven depth in both directions, with no pool to fund - what integrators see is a liquid asset.
No idle buffer against redemptions. Vault capital fronts the wait and recycles as each one completes.
The asset moves across markets and plugs into DeFi - reach and demand scale without a liquidity program.
One vault layer, every side of the market
Issuers list · Market makers price the wait · Depositors earn the discount
TetraFi builds settlement rails and modular on-chain primitives for the institutions moving on-chain - neobanks, exchanges, fintechs and asset managers.
The first product suite delivers liquidity aggregation, firm-quote execution and escrowed atomic cross-chain settlement, with policy enforcement configured per workspace.
Next come T+0 Vaults, Instant Redemption and a programmable credit layer, bridging the delayed settlement cycles traditional finance runs on with the instant-settlement expectations of the on-chain economy - and Multilateral Netting, which offsets obligations across the network so only the residual ever pays a settlement toll.
Think of it as the regulated settlement layer traditional finance has had for decades, built natively for on-chain assets.
It is infrastructure, not a competitor. Each institution runs its own deployment - immutable contracts, no custody key, no upgrade key, governed inside its own regulatory perimeter - while connecting to one shared liquidity and settlement network that gets deeper and more efficient as participation grows.
One integration. Contracts your institution owns and governs - no custody key, no upgrade key. A shared liquidity and settlement network behind them.